中国普外基础与临床杂志

中国普外基础与临床杂志

保乳切缘的病理学评估

查看全文

引用本文: 柳剑英, 步宏. 保乳切缘的病理学评估. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(2): 134-137. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.201801089 复制

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看全文内容。 没有账号,
1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(16): 1233-1241.
2. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(14): 1143-1150.
3. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg, 2002, 184(5): 383-393.
4. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer, 2010, 46(18): 3219-3232.
5. St John ER, Al-Khudairi R, Ashrafian H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Techniques for Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(2): 300-310.
6. Fleming FJ, Hill AD, Mc Dermott EW, et al. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2004, 30(3): 233-237.
7. Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg, 2005, 71(1): 22-27.
8. Esbona K, Li Z, Wilke LG. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(10): 3236-3245.
9. Carter D. Margins of " lumpectomy” for breast cancer. Hum Pathol, 1986, 17(4): 330-332.
10. Guidi AJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR, et al. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens. Cancer, 1997, 79(8): 1568-1573.
11. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(3): 704-716.
12. DeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Smith BD, et al. Assessment of Practice Patterns Following Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(10): 3250-3256.
13. Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, et al. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(29): 3885-3891.
14. Dzierzanowski M, Melville KA, Barnes PJ, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins. J Surg Oncol, 2005, 90(2): 71-76.
15. Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(12): 3801-3810.
16. Dunne C, Burke JP, Morrow M, et al. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(10): 1615-1620.
17. Kuerer HM, Smith BD, Chavez-MacGregor M, et al. DCIS Margins and Breast Conservation: MD Anderson Cancer Center Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines and Outcomes. J Cancer, 2017, 8(14): 2653-2662.
18. Martínez-Pérez C, Turnbull AK, Ekatah GE, et al. Current treatment trends and the need for better predictive tools in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Treat Rev, 2017, 55: 163-172.
19. Jorns JM, Visscher D, Sabel M, et al. Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. Am J Clin Pathol, 2012, 138(5): 657-669.
20. Osborn JB, Keeney GL, Jakub JW, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine frozen-section analysis of breast margins compared with reoperation for positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(11): 3204-3209.
21. Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med, 2015, 373(6): 503-510.
22. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Katz J, et al. The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg, 2002, 184(2): 89-93.
23. Skripenova S, Layfield LJ. Initial margin status for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and subsequent identification of carcinoma in reexcision specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010, 134(1): 109-114.
24. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer, 1985, 56(5): 979-990.
25. Faverly DR, Burgers L, Bult P, et al. Three dimensional imaging of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical implications. Semin Diagn Pathol, 1994, 11(3): 193-198.